 | - 4 to be charged in record ecstasy case, PG decides
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Deadlock at Rosh Pinah
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Computer theft ring cracked
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Our Nicolas Sarkozy must please stand up!
(May 17, 2007)
- Electricity in Namibia - Quo Vadis?
(May 17, 2007)
- Political Perspective
(May 17, 2007)
- Attacks On Media Persist
(May 17, 2007)
- 'Not guilty', says family shooting suspect Endjala
(May 16, 2007)
- Racist backlash angers City Lutheran pastor
(May 16, 2007)
- Episode two in rugby’s Who’s the Boss?
(May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
 | - All topics
- Buisiness and Economy (May 10, 2007)
- Computer Games (May 11, 2007)
- Entertainment Music, Movies .... (Aug 06, 2007)
- Enviroment (May 17, 2007)
- General Health (May 16, 2007)
- International News (May 08, 2007)
- Namibia in the News (Aug 06, 2007)
- Namibian Elections 2004 (May 16, 2007)
- PostNuke (May 16, 2007)
- Religion (May 13, 2007)
- Science and Technology (May 16, 2007)
- Sport (May 17, 2007)
- Travel, Tourism (May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
|
|
 | | Posted by admin on Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 08:03 AM |
|  |
 |  | NEW legislation
forcing municipalities to participate in the restructuring of the R30bn
electricity distribution industry will be signed into law before June,
sending a strong signal that government wants the long- delayed process
to be finalised within the set deadlines. Khulu Phasiwe
The Electricity Restructuring Bill,
which awaits the signature of President Thabo Mbeki to become law, will
also set the much-awaited guidelines on how power utility Eskom and the
187 licensed municipal distributors will be compensated for merging
their assets to form six regional electricity distributors.
The proposed new legislation is expected to address
concerns raised by both Eskom and municipalities about how they should
be compensated for their assets.
Some municipalities feared they would lose revenue by
surrendering their electricity distribution assets to the new regional
power distributors.
Historically, municipalities have made big surpluses on
electricity sales and have used these profits to subsidise other
services.
Addressing delegates at the Gauteng electricity summit
yesterday, Deputy Minister of Minerals and Energy, Lulu Xingwana, said
the absence of enabling legislation had resulted in the stalling of the
restructuring process. SA presently has one regional distributor, led
by the Cape Town municipality.
Xingwana said a lack of compensation guidelines had also
resulted in Eskom and Cape Town municipality operating through a “whole
number of agreements” in a bid to deliver services to the customers in
that area’s regional distribution business.
The participation of municipalities in the restructuring
process of the electricity industry has to date been voluntary, a
loophole that some local authorities had exploited to stall the process.
Government said the restructuring was aimed at
integrating the electricity distribution industry and to eliminate the
existing 2000 sets of tariff that Eskom and municipalities charge
customers.
The plan is to establish six regional distributors by June next year, and a national distributor is also in the pipeline.
Although Eskom has already restructured its seven
distribution regions into six divisions in line with the six regional
power distributors, the parastatal said yesterday that it preferred
entering into a commercial agreement with the new regional distributors
instead of owning a stake in them.
Eskom’s MD of the distribution division, Mongezi
Ntsokolo, told the summit the company preferred compensation either
through interest-bearing financial instruments or asset-lease
agreements.
“We would like to have our compensation in one cheque, if
possible. Otherwise this will give a wrong signal to financiers that we
are giving our assets away,” said Ntsokolo.
He said Eskom preferred to retain its key industrial customers.
But Gauteng MEC for local government Qedani Mahlangu
lashed out at Eskom’s suggestion. She said Eskom, as a state-owned
enterprise, should partner government to achieve its socio- economic
goals.
Saleem Mowzer, CEO of SA’s first regional electricity distributor, agreed with Mahlangu.
“Our view is that the assets belonging to Eskom have
been paid for by taxpayers and they should not be expected to pay twice
for them.”
Mowzer said his distributor favoured the option where
each participant owned shares in proportion to the value of the assets
they had contributed to the entity.
| |
|  |
|
|
|
|