 | - 4 to be charged in record ecstasy case, PG decides
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Deadlock at Rosh Pinah
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Computer theft ring cracked
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Our Nicolas Sarkozy must please stand up!
(May 17, 2007)
- Electricity in Namibia - Quo Vadis?
(May 17, 2007)
- Political Perspective
(May 17, 2007)
- Attacks On Media Persist
(May 17, 2007)
- 'Not guilty', says family shooting suspect Endjala
(May 16, 2007)
- Racist backlash angers City Lutheran pastor
(May 16, 2007)
- Episode two in rugby’s Who’s the Boss?
(May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
 | - All topics
- Buisiness and Economy (May 10, 2007)
- Computer Games (May 11, 2007)
- Entertainment Music, Movies .... (Aug 06, 2007)
- Enviroment (May 17, 2007)
- General Health (May 16, 2007)
- International News (May 08, 2007)
- Namibia in the News (Aug 06, 2007)
- Namibian Elections 2004 (May 16, 2007)
- PostNuke (May 16, 2007)
- Religion (May 13, 2007)
- Science and Technology (May 16, 2007)
- Sport (May 17, 2007)
- Travel, Tourism (May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
|
|
 | | Posted by admin on Thursday, April 06, 2006 - 08:30 AM |
|  |
 |  | TIGHTER
regulation and control over the auditing profession will mean
additional costs for auditors, says Kariem Hoosain, CE of the new
Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors. Sanchia Temkin
The South African auditing
profession’s rules were overhauled following the collapse of US energy
giant Enron and recent local corporate disasters such as Regal Treasury
Bank, MacMed, Saambou and Unifer.
A decade after it was first announced, the Auditing
Profession Act was passed into law on April 1 and the new board is to
replace the Public Accountants’ and Auditors’ Board.
It was feared that new rules and the infrastructure governing the auditing profession could drive up costs for big business.
Hoosain said on Tuesday that some of the costs would
include accreditation and registration fees. They would also be tied up
in the new disciplinary process.
He said auditing firms and auditors would be required to
register with the board, which “could prove burdensome for the sole
proprietor”.
He said firms could also be held accountable for the wrongdoing of an employee, whether or not the employee was an auditor.
A new funding model was to be developed that would see
the board funded by government and the profession, with at least a 50%
contribution from government.
Hoosain said the board had requested R14m in funds from Finance Minister Trevor Manuel.
The act would be phased in over nine months under a plan
submitted to government. The plan set out timeframes for the various
sections of the legislation to be phased in.
A significant change under the act was the broadening of
the jurisdiction of the regulator from individual auditors to include
auditing firms. This would allow the regulator to review the standards
and behaviour of firms and not just of the registered auditors who
worked for them, said Hoosain.
In anticipation of this provision, the Public
Accountants’ and Auditors’ Board (the former regulator) established a
programme of firm reviews and the new board recently commenced its
first review of one of SA’s big four auditing firms.
The costs of the reviews of the “big four” are expected to be about R1m per firm and R50000-R60000 for smaller firms.
| |
|  |
|
|
|
|