 | - 4 to be charged in record ecstasy case, PG decides
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Deadlock at Rosh Pinah
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Computer theft ring cracked
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Our Nicolas Sarkozy must please stand up!
(May 17, 2007)
- Electricity in Namibia - Quo Vadis?
(May 17, 2007)
- Political Perspective
(May 17, 2007)
- Attacks On Media Persist
(May 17, 2007)
- 'Not guilty', says family shooting suspect Endjala
(May 16, 2007)
- Racist backlash angers City Lutheran pastor
(May 16, 2007)
- Episode two in rugby’s Who’s the Boss?
(May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
 | - All topics
- Buisiness and Economy (May 10, 2007)
- Computer Games (May 11, 2007)
- Entertainment Music, Movies .... (Aug 06, 2007)
- Enviroment (May 17, 2007)
- General Health (May 16, 2007)
- International News (May 08, 2007)
- Namibia in the News (Aug 06, 2007)
- Namibian Elections 2004 (May 16, 2007)
- PostNuke (May 16, 2007)
- Religion (May 13, 2007)
- Science and Technology (May 16, 2007)
- Sport (May 17, 2007)
- Travel, Tourism (May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
|
|
 | | Posted by admin on Wednesday, December 27, 2006 - 09:38 AM |
|  |
 |  | Tamar Kahn - Science and Health Editor
CAPE TOWN — Introducing male
circumcision programmes to African countries hard hit by HIV/AIDS could
save billions of dollars, according to a new study published this week
by the Public Library of Science (PloS) journal. Three recent African studies have
shown that male circumcision cuts the risk of HIV transmission up to
60%, raising hopes that the procedure could be incorporated into
HIV-prevention programmes.
SA has one of the world’s worst HIV/AIDS epidemics, with
more than 5,5-million people infected with the disease, and many local
experts regard male circumcision as a potential tool for preventing
more infections. About 35% of South African men are circumcised,
according to a 2002 study by the Human Sciences Research Council.
The same researchers who conducted a key study in Orange
Farm near Johannesburg last year have now calculated that the costs of
providing circumcision services to 1000 men in Gauteng would prevent
300 new HIV infections over 20 years, saving $2,4m in AIDS treatment.
Greater savings could be expected if large-scale male
circumcision programmes were implemented, as there would be economies
of scale, said study co-author Bertran Auvert, of the French National
Health and Medical Research Agency.
“The point is you will save money in the long term by spending now …,” he said.
After the Orange Farm study was published, the World
Health Organisation (WHO) advised countries to wait for the results of
trials in Uganda and Kenya before designing policies.
Those two studies, published earlier this month, found
male circumcision cut the risk of HIV transmission by half. The WHO and
the United Nations joint agency on HIV/AIDS, UNAIDS, are expected to
hold a meeting on the issue next month, said Auvert.
“I have no doubt their recommendation will be to make
safe male circumcision available where HIV prevalence is high…,” he
said, noting that Zambia had already decided to promote the procedure
as part of its HIV-prevention programmes.
Several independent studies indicated that between 50%
and 80% of uncircumcised men would be willing to undergo the procedure
in order to lower the risk of HIV infection, he said.
The health department has previously said it was waiting
for the Uganda and Kenyan trial results before formulating a policy on
the issue.
Experts have emphasised the challenge of communicating
the benefits of male circumcision, as the procedure offers only partial
protection against HIV.
“For the first time there is really good news for Africa
on HIV, but the challenge is implementation,” said Auvert. “It is a
complementary prevention tool — it’s not going to replace condoms or
(voluntary counselling and testing),” he said.
In an interview with Reuters, Auvert’s co-author, James
Kahn, said male circumcision could save as much as $5bn over 10 years
if it was implemented throughout sub-Saharan Africa. | |
|  |
|
|
|
|