 | - 4 to be charged in record ecstasy case, PG decides
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Deadlock at Rosh Pinah
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Computer theft ring cracked
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Our Nicolas Sarkozy must please stand up!
(May 17, 2007)
- Electricity in Namibia - Quo Vadis?
(May 17, 2007)
- Political Perspective
(May 17, 2007)
- Attacks On Media Persist
(May 17, 2007)
- 'Not guilty', says family shooting suspect Endjala
(May 16, 2007)
- Racist backlash angers City Lutheran pastor
(May 16, 2007)
- Episode two in rugby’s Who’s the Boss?
(May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
 | - All topics
- Buisiness and Economy (May 10, 2007)
- Computer Games (May 11, 2007)
- Entertainment Music, Movies .... (Aug 06, 2007)
- Enviroment (May 17, 2007)
- General Health (May 16, 2007)
- International News (May 08, 2007)
- Namibia in the News (Aug 06, 2007)
- Namibian Elections 2004 (May 16, 2007)
- PostNuke (May 16, 2007)
- Religion (May 13, 2007)
- Science and Technology (May 16, 2007)
- Sport (May 17, 2007)
- Travel, Tourism (May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
|
|
 | | Posted by admin on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 07:55 AM |
|  |
 |  | THERE is no grey
when it comes to picking the Springbok squad and too much black and
white. There is also limited coaching science. In SA national selection remains more
of a colouring-in exercise, where what matters more is the colour of
the final picture and not necessarily the merits of that picture.
The country’s politicians don’t seem to care that just
two black wingers is the norm for the Bulls in the Super 14 and that
wingers make up nearly 50% of the South African black-playing numbers
in the competition.
It is not fashionable to hammer home the point in the
months that lead up to the international season. Politicians — and some
media — start showing an interest only in June every year, which is an
indictment of the sincerity and motives of those who seek a colourful
picture only at a national level.
Springbok coach Jake White can’t pick fewer black players
than he did last year because that would be interpreted as
transformation regression. Such an interpretation is flawed because
White’s pool base is dependent on players chosen by the regional
coaches. Invariably, this is limited to outside backs, the odd prop and
the occasional scrumhalf.
White and his selectors have to balance each selection
with a numbers count. How many black players? It complicates any
selection when a quality white player is trying to force his way into
the national squad.
Take Ruan Pienaar, Wynand Olivier and BJ Botha as three
examples of players who have performed consistently in this year’s
competition, and would be reasonably expected to make the Bok squad. If
White is to pick Pienaar, he has to drop Bolla Conradie, who currently
ranks behind Ricky Januarie and Fourie du Preez in the Bok pecking
order. But that means a white player replacing a black player, and if
White does that he has to balance it with finding a place for a black
player at the expense of a white player already in the squad.
It gets more complicated. To accommodate (BJ) Botha, the
form SA tighthead in the competition, he has to drop one of Lawrence
Sephaka or Eddie Andrews. Again I am using the national pecking order
that has CJ van der Linde as one and Sephaka and Andrews as two and
three.
Wayne Julies is another who stands in the way of Wynand
Olivier. Julies is behind Jean de Villiers and De Wet Barry in the
pecking order as a No 12.
White has Bryan Habana and potentially Januarie as first
choice options. Outside of that where does he go? To the wing with one
of the Ndungane twins, Jongi Nokwe or Tonderai Chavhanga? Or does he
reinvest in Breyton Paulse, back from France in June?
Nine months ago a Bok match that boasted nine black
players beat Australia at Ellis Park. It was a significant day in Bok
rugby, but if White and his selectors were able to pick who they felt
were the 15 best, as all their opponents can, they would not get past
three black players on any given Saturday, given form and black number
limitations when it comes to positional choice.
In the context of Springbok rugby, that will never be
deemed good enough. So invariably the compromise comes at a national
level, while the likes of the Bulls and Cheetahs are able to pick
largely white teams in the Super 14, using merit as their guide.
Who would want to be the national coach when the
responsibility of painting the right picture comes against the
expectation of winning a World Cup? Who would want to be him when
regional coaches can do as they please, with total disregard for the
colour of the bigger national picture?
Jake White in 2004 was voted the best coach in the world.
He should have got the award as best artist because the colourful
picture he painted in the past two years was a damn side harder than
any coaching he did. Pretty pictures, though, don’t win you World Cups,
which generally require a bit more science.
‖Read Keohane daily on www.keo.co.za - online partner of SA Rugby Magazine | |
|  |
|
|
|
|