 | - 4 to be charged in record ecstasy case, PG decides
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Deadlock at Rosh Pinah
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Computer theft ring cracked
(Aug 06, 2007)
- Our Nicolas Sarkozy must please stand up!
(May 17, 2007)
- Electricity in Namibia - Quo Vadis?
(May 17, 2007)
- Political Perspective
(May 17, 2007)
- Attacks On Media Persist
(May 17, 2007)
- 'Not guilty', says family shooting suspect Endjala
(May 16, 2007)
- Racist backlash angers City Lutheran pastor
(May 16, 2007)
- Episode two in rugby’s Who’s the Boss?
(May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
 | - All topics
- Buisiness and Economy (May 10, 2007)
- Computer Games (May 11, 2007)
- Entertainment Music, Movies .... (Aug 06, 2007)
- Enviroment (May 17, 2007)
- General Health (May 16, 2007)
- International News (May 08, 2007)
- Namibia in the News (Aug 06, 2007)
- Namibian Elections 2004 (May 16, 2007)
- PostNuke (May 16, 2007)
- Religion (May 13, 2007)
- Science and Technology (May 16, 2007)
- Sport (May 17, 2007)
- Travel, Tourism (May 15, 2007)
|
|  |
|
|
 | | Posted by admin on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 07:36 AM |
|  |
 |  | GOVERNMENT is
considering withholding incentives from companies that charge customers
import parity prices, a senior trade and industry department official
says. Siseko Njobeni
Such a step could hit major industrial
groups, such as Mittal Steel SA and Sasol, which in the past have come
under fire from local downstream manufacturers for applying import
parity pricing.
Government leaders, notably President Thabo Mbeki and
Trade and Industry Minister Mandisi Mpahlwa, have spoken out against
the continued use of the controversial pricing mechanism, under which
major local manufacturers charge customers the price it would cost to
import the product.
State benefits that could be reconsidered include
programmes such as government’s Strategic Industrial Projects (SIP)
incentive initiative, which offers tax breaks to companies investing at
least R50m in qualifying projects.
“As we design our industrial incentives, we will have to
review providing support to companies charging import parity prices,”
said Nimrod Zalk, chief director of the trade and industry department’s
competitiveness unit.
“The logic is, why should we provide support to companies that engage in a pricing mechanism that damages the economy?”
Zalk said government’s decision would apply to future
incentives and not retroactively. “We will not take away the benefits
that companies enjoy, unless there is a clear breach in the conditions
of the incentives,” he said.
Customers of these companies argue that the prices charged are inflated.
The pricing model has again come under the spotlight
because of the Competition Tribunal hearings on Mittal Steel prices.
Gold producers DRDGOLD and Harmony have filed a complaint against
Mittal Steel with the tribunal, arguing that the steel giant’s pricing
of flat steel products in the domestic market is excessive.
Mittal Steel SA spokesman Thami Didiza on Monday said the
company no longer applied the import parity pricing mechanism. Prices
were benchmarked on those of comparable markets.
| |
|  |
|
|
|
|